Tag: software development

  • Build vs Buy in the AI Era: How to Decide Without Regretting It Later

    Build vs Buy in the AI Era: How to Decide Without Regretting It Later

    Every enterprise leadership team eventually walks into a board meeting holding the same slide: should we build our own AI, or buy an existing platform? In 2026, that decision carries more weight than ever. Worldwide AI spending is forecast to reach $2.59 trillion this year, a 47% jump year-over-year, according to Gartner. Yet the return on all that investment remains stubbornly elusive.

    The most cited warning comes from MIT. Its State of AI in Business 2025 report, published by the NANDA initiative, found that roughly 95% of enterprise generative-AI pilots delivered no measurable impact on the bottom line with only about 5% reaching production with real value. (It’s worth noting some analysts have questioned the study’s methodology, so treat the figure as a directional signal rather than gospel.) Crucially, the report concluded the divide wasn’t caused by model quality. It came down to how organizations approached deployment and whether they integrated AI into real workflows or bolted on generic tools.

    That single insight reframes the build-vs-buy question entirely. This is not a technology decision. It is a strategy decision. And getting it wrong is expensive in both directions.

    The Two Ways to Get It Wrong

    Enterprise AI failures cluster around two opposite mistakes.

    Over-buying means adopting generic, off-the-shelf tools that demo beautifully but prove brittle in production. They don’t learn your workflows, don’t respect your data model, and don’t move the metrics that matter. The result is high adoption, low transformation.

    Over-building is the reverse: rebuilding commodity capabilities transcription, generic chatbots, standard document extraction from scratch when a mature vendor product already does it well. The cost is staggering, and not just upfront. Custom AI platforms typically carry annual maintenance of 20–30% of the original build cost, before accounting for the scarce, expensive ML talent required to keep them running.

    A Framework: Buy, Boost, or Build

    MIT Sloan popularized a more useful lens than a simple binary: buy, boost, or build.

    Buy when the capability is commoditized and speed matters. General-purpose copilots, standard OCR, and mature vendor platforms rarely justify a ground-up build. If a competitor could purchase the same tool tomorrow, it is not your competitive moat.

    Build when AI is central to your differentiation when the capability depends on proprietary data no vendor can replicate, or when data sovereignty, regulatory control, and deep workflow integration are non-negotiable.

    Boost the path most enterprises actually land on when a vendor platform gets you 70% of the way, and you add the proprietary layer on top: custom retrieval, workflow logic, evaluation, integrations, and human-in-the-loop controls. Buy the foundation, build the differentiator.

    Five Questions That Decide It

    For any given initiative, the decision comes down to five factors, scored workflow by workflow rather than once for the whole organization:

    1. Capability — do we have the internal talent to build and, more importantly, maintain this?
    2. Complexity — is this a standard use case or genuinely proprietary?
    3. Criticality — how central is this to our competitive position?
    4. Time-to-value — can we afford a six-to-twelve-month build, or do we need results this quarter?
    5. Lock-in risk — does buying route us permanently into one vendor’s ecosystem?

    The most common error is treating build-vs-buy as a single, binary call made once. It isn’t. A mature enterprise will buy commodity layers, boost vendor platforms for edge cases, and build only the handful of capabilities that define its market position.

    The Way Forward

    The organizations pulling ahead in 2026 are not the ones spending the most, nor the ones with the largest in-house AI teams. They are the ones asking the right question for each workflow and then executing with secure architecture, clear ROI metrics, and the discipline to integrate AI into how work actually gets done.

    The regret rarely comes from choosing build or buy. It comes from choosing without a framework.

    Ready to Make the Right Call?

    Explore our AI services: See how Integriti’s AI & Automation Solutions help enterprises architect the right build, buy, or hybrid strategy and integrate AI into workflows that deliver measurable ROI.

    Talk to our team: Facing a build-vs-buy decision right now? Book a free 30-minute consultation and walk away with a clear decision framework for your top-priority use case.

  • Enterprise Agentic AI: Foundation Before Agents

    Enterprise Agentic AI: Foundation Before Agents

    Every boardroom conversation in 2026 seems to circle back to one word: agents. Autonomous systems that don’t just answer questions but plan, decide, and act on their own. The excitement is justified and so is the caution.

    Gartner expects 40% of enterprise applications to embed task-specific AI agents by the end of 2026, up from less than 5% a year earlier. Yet the same analysts warn that more than 40% of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by the end of 2027, undone by escalating costs, unclear business value, and weak risk controls. Both numbers are true at once. The gap between them is where most organizations will either win or quietly waste their budgets.

    The Uncomfortable Data

    The most sobering signal comes from MIT. Its 2025 State of AI in Business report found that roughly 95% of enterprise generative-AI pilots delivered no measurable impact on the bottom line. The failures, researchers noted, were rarely about the model. They were about brittle workflows, missing feedback loops, and data that was never ready for production.

    That last point is the quiet killer. Gartner predicts 60% of AI projects will be abandoned through 2026 because organizations lack AI-ready data — and 63% of organizations either lack the right data-management practices or are unsure whether they have them. Informatica’s 2025 CDO survey ranked data quality and readiness as the number-one obstacle to AI success.

    The pattern is unmistakable: agents fail not because the intelligence is weak, but because the foundation beneath them is.

    → See how we assess data readiness before any agent goes live 

    Why Agents Amplify Your Weaknesses

    A chatbot that retrieves a wrong answer is an inconvenience. An autonomous agent that acts on bad data — approving an invoice, adjusting inventory, escalating a case — turns that inconvenience into a business consequence. Autonomy raises the stakes of every flaw already living in your environment.

    This is why “foundation before agents” isn’t a slogan it’s a sequence. Before deploying autonomous systems, three things have to be in place:

    • Clean, governed, accessible data. McKinsey’s 2025 research found organizations reporting significant returns from AI were markedly more likely to have redesigned their end-to-end data workflows before choosing models.
    • Clear ownership and guardrails. Gartner’s 2026 Hype Cycle flagged agentic-AI governance, security, and cost discipline as defining concerns emerging early — not afterthoughts.
    • A defined outcome. The winning 5% in MIT’s study consistently started with a measurable business problem, not a flashy demo.

    Start Where the Foundation Is Strongest

    The encouraging news is that adoption intent is real, and disciplined teams are pulling ahead.

    Gartner’s 2026 CIO survey found only 17% of organizations have deployed AI agents so far, but more than 60% expect to within two years the most aggressive adoption curve of any emerging technology measured.

    The organizations in that leading 17% rarely started with the most glamorous use case. They started where their data was cleanest, their workflows best understood, and their success metrics clearest often in the back office, where MIT found returns were highest. They treated agents as accountable systems with defined responsibilities, not as magic layered on top of legacy chaos.

    → Talk to our team about a governed agentic-AI roadmap

    The Takeaway

    Agentic AI will reshape enterprise operations over the next decade — Gartner’s best-case scenario has it driving roughly 30% of enterprise application software revenue, more than $450 billion, by 2035. But that future belongs to the companies that resist the temptation to rush.

    The question worth asking in your next planning session isn’t

    “which agent should we build first?”

    It’s “is our foundation ready to be trusted with autonomy?”

    Get that answer right, and the agents will follow. Get it wrong, and you risk joining the 40% of projects quietly shut down by 2027.

    Build the foundation first. The agents are the easy part.

  • Importance of modern JS frameworks and SPAs

    When it comes to modern front-end web development, how essential are JavaScript Frameworks?

    In computer programming, a framework is a foundation over which programmers build their software. A JavaScript framework would provide similar assistance. It provides a set of prewritten code enabling developers to use the framework as a structure for the JavaScript program or application without having to start from scratch. These frameworks are easier to apply as most applications and websites have some common features. Hence, they provide businesses with a great opportunity to reduce their development time and make the task less laborious for the development team.

    So, just as the skeleton is important for the support and shape of the human body, JavaScript frameworks are essential for providing a foundation for a given website or application.

    When we talk about modern JS frameworks, there are three in particular that we must discuss given their popularity and importance and building scalable interactive web applications.

    • Angular
    • React
    • Vue.js

    Let’s dig deep into each of these.

    Angular Framework

    Developed by Google, Angular is an open-source web application framework written in TypeScript and used for developing single-page applications (SPA).

    The features offered by this framework are:

    • Free control over adaptability.
    • Capability to meet huge data requirements.
    • Data binding & Dynamic rendering.
    • Simple, declarative, and effective templates (with easier DOM manipulation & two-way binding).
    • Instant help and feedback related to Angular with practically every IDE.
    • Intuitive API and ability to reuse the code to meet a particular development target.

    React Framework

    Most Popular JavaScript Frameworks
    Image Source: Google Trends

    Introduced in 2013, React is a reusable framework created by Facebook. According to Google Trends, React is one of the most popular frameworks. It is ideal for developing interactive user interfaces and offers features like:

    • Virtual DOM Model facilitating easy integration with applications.
    • Reusable components making website or application development simpler.
    • One-way flow of data (more intuitive than bi-directional data binding).
    • Reload feature which allows users to immediately see the applied changes.

    Vue.js Framework

    A free open-source JavaScript framework, Vue.js is a progressive front-end framework that is approachable and easy to learn. Despite being a relatively new framework, it has already earned popularity due to its various features and is suitable for developing both small and large applications. Vue.js has the following features:

    • Reusable codes & predefined options for custom elements.
    • Employs an MVVM structural pattern to separate the GUI from the model’s business logic.
    • Dual integration mode to build high-end SPA.

    Which JS framework is the best?

    When it comes to web development, JavaScript continues to be the leading programming language even today. There are several frameworks, other than the three we mentioned, with their unique features, advantages, and drawbacks.

    However, out of all of these, there is no “best” JS framework.

    Each website or application comes with its own specific requirements which need to be decided before choosing an ideal framework. Remember, each framework has some exclusive features, and it is crucial to evaluate which one matches your requirements best.

    When working for our software development clients at Integriti, we first sit down to discuss project requirements and then evaluate each framework accordingly. We also consider a framework’s complexity, learning curve, and compatibility documentation before making a choice.

    How to make the right framework choice?

    JavaScript frameworks are key to optimizing the entire web development process and saving time, effort, and money. However, there is not one framework that is the perfect match for all projects.

    How are you going to make the right framework choice for your project and ensure a more efficient development process?

    To find the right framework, you need to consider four factors.

    • Existing Toolstack.
    • Complexity
    • Performance Requirements
    • Technical Competence

    Let’s explore each of these in detail below.

    Existing Toolstack

    It is important to make sure that the framework you are considering is compatible with the front-end programming language of the project. For example, if Java or Python is being used then you must select from their respective frameworks.

    If you’re looking to apply a framework to a pre-existing site, then more factors come into play. For instance, you need to consider the time and resources needed to build a new website with a framework as opposed to implementing that framework in an already existing code.

    Complexity

    Some frameworks can support large applications while some are suitable for building SPAs. Hence, you need to understand and evaluate the scope of the project before selecting a framework best suited to your project requirements.

    Performance requirements

    Another factor that you need to consider is the speed of your website. Some frameworks prioritize quick responses due to their focus on virtual DOM. On the other hand, if your project requires more built-in functions and control then a more robust framework would be a better choice.

    Technical Competence

    Some JavaScript frameworks are easy to learn and implement while others are more complicated but offer extra features. If you must use a framework soon, then an easy-to-use framework would be a better choice depending upon the proficiency of your team. However, if you are not short on time then a more complex framework can be beneficial in the long run.

    When deciding on the right JavaScript framework for your project you might not need to be restricted to one framework. If a project is using microservices architecture, then it might be worthwhile to use multiple frameworks.

    These decisions are critical for optimizing your web development process and should be taken after consulting with a tech professional.

    Single-page applications

    Single-page applications are applications that work inside the browser and do not need page reloading in the course of use. SPAs are part of your everyday use and include examples like Gmail, Google Maps, GitHub, and Facebook. They serve an exceptional UX by trying to replicate a “natural” environment in the browser with no page reloads and extra wait time etc. Basically, it’s one web page that you visit which then loads other content utilizing JavaScript.

    SPAs are heavily dependent on JavaScript.

    They request the markup and data independently and render pages up front in the browser. We can achieve this by using advanced JavaScript frameworks like Angular, Meteor.js, Ember.js, Knockout.js, etc.

    Single-page sites are important in today’s digital age because they help keep the user in a comfortable web space where content is displayed in a simple, easy, and effective manner. They offer a much better user experience as you can easily navigate through content without waiting for the pages to load.

    The major distinction between multi-page and single-page applications is that SPAs download the page a single time. SPAs are also much faster in terms of interactivity because when a user interacts with the app, only the required component is modified not the complete application.

    Modern JS frameworks are essential in helping business optimize their web development process. They can help you save on time and costs when developing web applications. This is especially true for developing single-page applications (SPAs) which are very much in demand due to the fast speed of operations they offer.

    If you are looking for a partner for your front-end development project, get in touch with us here.

    ‍

  • Layered architecture: What it is and how it can help you create applications?

    Application Layer Diagram

    What is web application architecture?

    Application architecture is the representation of how different services and systems are joined together. It helps us to understand how applications or services are placed in a layered architecture, who are the different actors at each layer and what is the fundamental role of each layer.

    It determines application components and different layers communicate with each other. These architectures are layered having different layers from the design or presentation layer to the data layer. Software architects or Web engineers ensure that all the elements or layers work together correctly.

    How does system architecture for web application works?

    In web application architecture, there are basically two parts working simultaneously, the client (frontend) and server (backend). The client represents the application UI on the browser from where the web server takes the request to the server, where the server has the code that responds to requests coming from the client. The Server manages the application logic and responds to HTTP requests.

    Models of web architecture

    One-tier architecture

    One-tier architecture involves putting all of the required components for a software application or technology on a single server or platform. This kind of architecture is often contrasted with multi-tiered architecture or the three-tier architecture that’s used for some Web applications and other technologies where various presentation, business, and data access layers are housed separately.

    Diagram of one-tier architecture

    Two-tier architecture

    The Two-tier architecture is divided into two parts: Client Application (Client-side) and Database (Server-side) respectively.

    Also called a client-server application, the communication in this architecture takes place between the client (browser) and the server. The client system will send the request to the server system which will process it and send back the data to the client side.

    Diagram of Two-tier architecture

    Multiple-tier architecture

    A Multi-tier Architecture is a software architecture in which different software components, arranged in tiers (layers), offer dedicated functionality. The most common example of multi-tier architecture is a three-tier system comprising a data management tier (encompassing one or several database servers), a client tier (interface functionality), and an application tier (business logic).

    Diagram of Multiple-tier architecture

    Microservices architecture

    You might have heard of the word microservices if you’re a tech enthusiast. Microservices are independent services like applications, which exist completely on their own. These come with their logic, state, and deployment and interact with each other via API calls, queues, etc. depending on the requirements. These microservices combine to deliver the complete application solution.

    With microservices architectures, applications are easier to scale and faster to develop allowing businesses to accelerate innovation and time-to-market for new features.

    Diagram of Microservices Architecture

    Layers and Components of Application Architecture

    The application architecture is made up of several layers: design layer, frontend layer (HTML and CSS), backend or data layer (database and scripting languages), platform (browser/OS), and business layer. These layers are built on top of each other and depend on each other to create a successful project.

    Presentation Layer

    This layer represents the design and UI components on the client side. Users interact with this layer to send requests through the application layer to the server. It displays the data flow for the users. The main purpose of this layer is to take data from users and show the response from the server (data layer).

    Our UI team can help you create the right experience to help your business attract customers’ attention.

    Application Layer

    The application layer consists of an API gateway. Front-end developers write code to pass the data from the presentation layer to the business logic layer where it is processed. Data will pass to APIs and get stored in the database, depending on the feature it is utilized in the business layer for application logic and to perform certain actions.

    Business Layer

    This layer has all implementation of application logic. Data from the application layer gets utilized here for example in a lead generation application a form is submitted in the presentation layer and data travels through APIs and is then used to send out emails or to perform any action on the lead before getting stored in the database.

    Data or Backend Layer

    All the data gets stored in the database and retrieved from it to use on the front end (client-side). Data travels from the database through APIs, from the application layer in creating modules or components that are converted to UI and the user then interacts with that in the presentation layer.

    Conclusion:

    To conclude, there are different ways to set up the architecture for applications software. Microservices architecture is the most popular choice of mid-sized and large companies like Amazon and Google. However, in order to find out more about which architecture to go with for building your project we recommend you reach out to any professional web development team that can guide you according to your needs and goals.

    Want us to help you build your next big product? Contact us.

    ‍

  • Most Globally In-Demand Programming Languages, 2021.

    How do you choose a programming language from the plethora of options available?

    Mastering a new programming language can help you advance further in your career or switch careers completely. But you might be wondering how to make the right choice. After all, you will likely have to invest your time and money to learn it. The sheer number of programming languages out there does not help the situation either. This decision will likely involve several considerations like your past knowledge and coding skills, the difficulty level of a language, and your reasons for learning a new language in the first place.

    Another thing you should keep in mind while deciding on a programming language is employers’ demand. If you are aiming to work for big tech giants, then we suggest prioritizing programming languages that have earned their stripes. In fact, in our blog on most In-Demand web frameworks for 2021, we helped you choose the “right” framework by highlighting the needs of your potential employers. Following the similar approach here, we will be sharing In Demand programming languages for the year.

    A recent survey by CodinGame sheds light on the popularity of programming languages and their demand by employers. According to the results, more than half of the programmers knew how to code in JavaScript, Java, and Python. These three continue to be the most widely used programming languages in the world.

    A survey about most in demand programming languages

    On the demand side, results showed that close to 60% of the tech recruiters were on the lookout for professionals working with JavaScript and Java. These findings signal that the programmers and employers are in sync at least when it comes to these two languages. However, the same cannot be said for other languages like C, Python, etc. The demand for these languages is less than their popularity among programmers. For example, 57% of developers code in Python, but only 48% of companies need Python development. This gap is even bigger for C. 45.1% of programmers code in C however only 15.4% of companies require C development.

    These insights highlight how most tech companies favor 4 programming languages: JavaScript, Java, Python, and C#. In our opinion, it’s better to stick with JavaScript as it’s the most popular programming language for a reason. As a matter of fact, JavaScript development also made it to our list of Top Ten Tech skills in Canada for 2021! Most companies developing web UIs need to interface with JavaScript. Moreover, with the introduction of NodeJS, it’s also being used to develop server-side applications as well. If you want to learn a lesser-known language to stand out, then consider TypeScript. This past October, TypeScript was named among the fastest-growing languages in GitHub’s Octoverse Report. The results also showed a small shortage for this language as 24% of companies needed TypeScript development but only 22% of developers knew it.

    The survey overall highlights the dominance of few major programming languages like Java, JavaScript, and Python. The results also suggest a surplus of developers dealing with Python and C. For these developers, it would be better to switch to other languages to improve their job prospects in this competitive environment.

  • Secrets of performance-oriented frontend development

    When a web page takes longer than three seconds to load, 40% of visitors leave, increasing the bounce rate.

    Similarly, a slow mobile app would also have poor performance and irritate consumers. After a few tries, the customer will remove your application and download a more user-friendly one.

    The ease of use and user-friendliness of your specific digital solution have a direct impact on the performance of the app. If compromised, it degrades the user experience and lessens the likelihood that users will engage frequently or stay connected to the app or website over time.

    On the other hand, developing a web or mobile app with front-end performance in mind increases the chance that your product will succeed. As a result, your priority should be to create an app or website that loads quickly, is SEO-friendly, performs well, and is well-designed.

    Here are a few secrets that can help you build up your performance-oriented front-end development.

    Optimize Images & Use WebP

    Images are a crucial component of web pages. Considering they increase user engagement, 93.7% of websites on the internet employ at least one image file format.

    The drawback of using images is that, unless they are optimized, they have a negative impact on the front-end loading time. However, there are various approaches to optimizing images:

    Use AVIF or WebP

    Compared to previous formats like JPEG and PNG, using modern image formats like WebP and AVIF shows better performance. When compared to JPEG and PNG, WebP is between 25% and 35% smaller. AVIF is 20% and 50% smaller than WebP and JPEG, respectively.

    The browser support is the drawback, though. WebP acquired browser support only recently, so older versions may not support it. In contrast, Chrome and Opera are the only browsers that support AVIF. As a result, you must utilize the <picture> element in native HTML with fallback support.

    Serve images of the right dimensions.

    Using responsive images is another approach to speed up a website’s performance and cut down on image delivery time. Mobile and tablet devices account for more than 50% of all traffic. The frontend loading time could be further reduced by scaling the image to popular device dimensions and serving it using a srcset.

    There are numerous other methods you can use to speed up the frontend loading time through image optimization in addition to picking the right format and dimensions. Additional recommended best practices are:

    • Use of progressive JPEGs.
    • Use of HTTP/2 instead of HTTP/1.1.
    • Use of image sets.
    • Image Compression
    • Serve smaller images to users on slow connections.

    Compress Files & Use CDNs

    Building a lightweight front end for your web or mobile solution is made much easier with the use of content delivery networks, or CDNs. These web directories have a successful global network. Your app will load more quickly if you use files hosted on CDNs since you can use the cached versions of the files from the closest servers. It enables you to quickly serve more users while preventing bottlenecks.

    Compressing the files to be used comes next after using common files from CDNs. Every file, including documents, images (JPEG, PNG), videos, audio clips, and presentations, can be compressed to enhance the functionality of your application. There are many compression tools available on the market that might be deployed for this.

    Once you’ve completed these two steps, your website or application will be much more responsive to consumer inquiries.

    Bundle & Minify Assets

    Two different performance improvements you may use in a web app are bundling and minification. By minimizing the amount of the requested static assets and decreasing the number of server requests, bundling and minification combined enhance performance.

    Multiple files are combined into one file by bundling. The quantity of server requests required to render an online asset, such as a web page, is decreased via bundling. Numerous unique bundles made expressly for CSS, JavaScript, etc. are possible. Having fewer files means that the browser will make fewer HTTP requests to the server or to the service that hosts your application. As a result, first-page performance is enhanced.

    Code that has undergone minification has unnecessary characters removed without affecting functionality. As a result, the size of the requested assets is significantly reduced (such as CSS, images, and JavaScript files). One of the most frequent side effects of minification is the reduction of variable names to one character, as well as the removal of comments and extraneous whitespace.

    Bundling and minification mainly speed up the first page request load time. After a web page has been requested, the web browser caches the static assets (JavaScript, CSS, and images). Therefore, bundling and minification don’t enhance performance when the same page, or pages, on the same site, are requested with the same assets. If bundling and minification aren’t used and the expires header isn’t set correctly on the assets, then the browser’s freshness heuristics mark the assets stale after some days. The browser also requires a validation request for each asset. Bundling and minification in this situation increase performance even after the initial page request.

    Use Caching and prefetching

    Pre-fetching and caching are two essential tools for front-end web performance. Pre-fetching involves pre-loading resources such as images, scripts, and stylesheets so that they can be delivered to the user more quickly. Caching, on the other hand, involves storing assets on the user’s device so that they don’t have to be requested from the server every time the user visits the site.

    Both of these techniques have a huge impact on website performance and user experience. By pre-loading resources and caching assets, sites can load faster and be more responsive, leading to improved performance and better user experience. Additionally, pre-fetching and caching can reduce the burden on the server, which can help to keep costs down and make sites more resilient.

    So if you want to improve your site’s performance and user experience, be sure to take advantage of pre-fetching and caching.

    Reduce The Number Of Server Calls.

    Generally speaking, the more requests your front end sends to the server, the longer it takes to load. This is due to the fact that sending any request to the server demands full communication before the page can be rendered. There are several approaches you may take to cut down on the number of server requests required to load the website.

    One of the simplest ways to cut down on server calls is to use CSS Sprites. Sprite loads a single image file combined using a collection of images rather than ten separate images to the site. The background image and background-position CSS properties can be used to display the desired image segment. By doing this, you’re minimizing the number of server requests necessary.

    Reducing third-party plugins is also important as they make up a large number of external requests and cutting down on them will boost your application’s loading speed. Preventing broken links to files that don’t exist can also help.

    You might also consider server-side rendering to accelerate the application’s initial load time.

    Making the initial move is never easy. The future, however, belongs to those who aren’t scared to innovate and redefine conventional approaches. You can ensure that your website loads quickly and offers a positive user experience by using these web performance optimization approaches. Just be sure to keep everything simple, smart, and seamless. And keep in mind that you only have 15 seconds to make an impact!

    First impressions of apps and websites are based on their user interface (UI) and front-end. The ease of use, seamless navigation, and fast loading are just a few of the elements that determine whether a user will use your digital product again. Therefore, it’s crucial to consider a web solution’s performance efficiency, whether it’s an App or an e-commerce website. You will be able to do so by using the advice we’ve provided above.

    ‍

  • Serverless Architecture

    Serverless computing, also referred to as simply Serverless, is a famed topic of the software architecture world. The biggest cloud-providing platforms like Amazon, Google and Microsoft are continuing to invest heavily and research on this type of architecture. Serverless is a cloud computing code execution model where a certain cloud provider takes over responsibility for servers running along with computing resources management. To put it in a simple view, there are no physical or virtual servers to manage, because they are automatically deployed in the cloud by the third-party vendors. Some of the famous serverless providers are AWS Lambda, GCP Functions and Azure Functions.

    The main difference between the traditional and serverless architecture can be schematically seen in diagram 1.

    A diagram which shows the Traditional vs serverless architecture.
    Diagram 1: Traditional Vs. Serverless

    Components of the serverless application are:

    Functions

    Functions are what imply business and application logic. They execute code for certain actions. There can be multiple functions working as a composite function. Sometimes they may be triggered or self-initiated when a condition is met. This process is hidden from the user. The user creates a program code, specifies needed dependencies and uploads it. The provider then provides the computing environment.

    Backends

    This unit allows the development to shift backend regular functions from data storage to the cloud, managing latency of the architecture and dependencies deepening. It also aids with functionalities like Simple Notification Service (SNS), Simple Queue Service (SQS), kinesis for streaming data, data warehouse queries, batch data cloud dataflow and event grids.  

    Here is how a serverless setup looks like.

    Image shows serverless states
    Diagram 2: Serverless State

    When we talk about Serverless, it is primarily defined by two different but overlapping areas: “Backend as a Service” (BaaS) and “Function as a Service” (FaaS). BaaS and FaaS are related in their operational attributes and are frequently used together. Let’s find out what each of these scopes encompasses.

    BaaS

    This term is used to describe applications that significantly or fully incorporate third-party, cloud hosted applications and services to manage server-side logic and state. These are typically rich client applications like single page web apps or mobile apps that use the vast ecosystem of cloud accessible databases (e.g., Firebase), authentication services (AWS Cognito) and so on.

    FaaS

    This term is used to describe applications where server-side logic is written by developer but unlike mainstream architectures, its run-in stateless computer containers are event-triggered, ephemeral and managed by a third party. Containers specify OS and software configurations. Regarding uptime, the container keeps working until the current job is executed and destroyed. It can host any microservice and app and there are no timeout restrictions.

    Faas, replaces the click-processing physical server with something that does not need a provisional server nor a related app. The only code that needs to change when moving to FaaS is the main method, also called startup code. Handlers which manage message listener interfaces are also changed in the method signature.

    Deployment is very different from traditional systems. The code is uploaded to the FaaS provider and then the provider instantiates VM’s and manager process. Horizontal scaling is completely automatic, elastic and managed by the provider. If the system needs to process a hundred requests in parallel, computer containers come into play. They execute the functions and are created and destroyed purely driven by runtime need. Functions in FaaS are typically triggered by event types defined by the provider. Such event types include S3 (file/object) updates and Kinesis. They may also be triggered as a response to inbound HTTP requests via API gateway. However, this is an uncommon use of configuration from within the same cloud environment.

    When working in an instance-bound state or a machine state, there may be some restrictions posing to FaaS. Like data that is stored in variables or local disk. Such storage is available but there is no guarantee that such a state persists across multiple invocations and more strongly there should be no assumption made that state from one invocation of a function will be available to another invocation of the same function. This is the reason why FaaS are often described as stateless. But this may not a correct techical assessment. Rather it is appropriate to say that any state of a FaaS function that is required to be persistent needs to be externalized outside of the FaaS function instance. Any function will typically make use of a database, a cross app cache like Redis or a network file/object store to store state across requests or to provide further input necessary to handle a request.  

    New-retail business framework (NBF) is an open framework developed by the supply chain infrastructure technology team for new retail services. A serverless system like FaaS helps NBF achieve industry standard practices, load balancing and long-term sustainability. Diagram 3 shows how NBF works in conjunction with FaaS.

    Image about NBF-FaaS Architecture
    Diagram 3: NBF-FaaS Architecture

    Event Sources Function is an event driven set. Function Instances provide functions or microservices. The FaaS Controller manages function control services such as API Gateway or Backend for Front (BFF). Platform Service Functions relay on platform services such as privilege management API’s and OSS. Cloud Service Engine (CSE) provides dynamic scaling capabilities which rapidly adapt to different resources needs during on and off-peak hours. CSE optimizes container cold, hot start performance and serverless O&M tools such as logging, monitoring and link tracking. NBF containers use Open Service Gateway Initiative (OSGI) architecture and provide complete bundle lifecycle management, including load, start, unmount and delete as well as isolation and communication. The whole platform capabilities result in services release which allows for quick release of a function or to bundle as a service, service routing which includes polymorphism, degradation and moke routing, service management with service vision control and service start/stop and lastly the service O&M for serverless services, hybrid deployment, phased release, disaster recovery.

    Lastly the important concept to grasp is bundle communication. Bundles are able to utilize container capabilities such as Spring context hosting and AOP by using the import mechanism provided by containers. For example:

                  org.springframework       org.apache.commons.logging         org.aopalliance       org.aspectj    

    ‍
    The NBF containers create an independent sandbox for each bundle which ensures code level bundle isolation from time of loading thus preventing class and resource conflicts among bundles. They manage bundle context globally and provide plug-in hosting. This sums up how FaaS works and conjoins.

  • Shopify Plus: Is it Worth the Investment for Large-scale E-commerce?

    Shopify Plus: Is it Worth the Investment for Large-scale E-commerce?

    Picture background
    Shopify Plus: Is itWorth the Investment for Large-scale E-commerce?

    ‍

    In the world ofe-commerce, where competition is fierce and customer expectations are everevolving, choosing the right platform for your online store is a criticaldecision. For large-scale e-commerce businesses, scalability, flexibility, andperformance are paramount. Shopify Plus, the enterprise-level version of thepopular Shopify platform, has emerged as a compelling choice for businesseslooking to take their operations to the next level.

    But is it worth theinvestment? Let’s delve into the key considerations to help you determinewhether Shopify Plus is the right fit for your large-scale e-commerce venture.

     

    UnderstandingShopify Plus

    Before we assess itsworth, let’s first understand what Shopify Plus brings to the table:

    • Scalability: Shopify Plus is designed to handle high-volumesales and traffic, making it suitable for large e-commerce stores experiencingrapid growth.
    • Customization: It offers extensive customization options,including access to the platform’s source code, allowing businesses to tailortheir online stores to their unique needs.
    • RobustInfrastructure: Shopify Plusincludes features like unlimited bandwidth, automated backups, andenterprise-grade security, ensuring reliability and protection of your onlineassets.
    • DedicatedSupport: Users of Shopify Plusreceive dedicated support, which can be crucial for resolving issues promptlyand efficiently.
    • Multi-Channel Selling: With Shopify Plus, you can easily expand yourpresence across various sales channels, including social media andmarketplaces.

    Now, let’s dive intothe factors that can help you determine whether investing in Shopify Plus isjustified for your large-scale e-commerce business:

    • SalesVolume: Shopify Plus is mostcost-effective for businesses with significant sales volumes. If you’reprocessing a substantial number of transactions each month, the platform’sfixed pricing model can be advantageous.
    •  CustomizationNeeds: If your businessrequires extensive customization, Shopify Plus provides the flexibility tocreate a tailored online shopping experience. Evaluate the extent ofcustomization you need and whether it justifies the additional cost.
    • Performanceand Reliability: Consider yourcurrent and projected website traffic. If you’ve experienced website slowdownsor outages due to high traffic, Shopify Plus can provide the performance andreliability you need to prevent such issues.
    • GlobalExpansion: If your e-commercebusiness is expanding internationally, Shopify Plus offers multi-language andmulti-currency support, simplifying the process of reaching global markets.
    • DedicatedSupport: Assess the importanceof dedicated support. For large-scale operations, having a responsive supportteam can be invaluable in resolving technical issues and improving the overallcustomer experience.
    • TotalCost of Ownership: Calculatethe total cost of ownership, factoring in the platform’s subscription cost,development and customization expenses, and potential third-party app costs.Ensure that the benefits outweigh the investment.
    • CompetitiveAdvantage: Consider how ShopifyPlus can give you a competitive edge in your niche. Are the features itprovides essential for staying ahead of your competitors?

    Conclusion

    Shopify Plus isundoubtedly a powerful platform with a range of features tailored to meet theneeds of large-scale e-commerce businesses. However, whether it’s worth theinvestment depends on your specific circumstances and goals. Carefully evaluateyour sales volume, customization requirements, performance needs, and growthplans to determine if Shopify Plus aligns with your business strategy.

    In many cases, the benefitsof Shopify Plus, including scalability, customization, and dedicated support,can outweigh the costs, making it a sound investment for large-scale e-commerceventures committed to delivering exceptional online shopping experiences.Ultimately, the decision should be based on a thorough analysis of yourbusiness’s unique requirements and long-term objectives.

  • Essential software security trends to watch out for in 2022

    In recent years, cybercrime has become more sophisticated, professionalized, and personalized. And it is only headed to become graver. Small and large companies of all backgrounds are prone to threats which include but are not limited to malware, ransomware, and data breaches. Research shows that 37% of IT companies were targeted for ransomware in 2021 alone. Out of which only 8% of the data was recovered after the ransom payment.

    The threat not only pertains to software, companies, and employees, but to other concerned parties too. Mitigating these threats should be the goal. While it may not be entirely possible, going forward, implementing the following practices can secure software development frameworks for businesses.

    Zero Trust & Access Control

    Zero-trust policies consider every individual who interacts with the software as a threat. It requires identity verification at every step to protect IT resources. It would be advisable for developers to implement the zero-trust architecture in the initial stages of the SDLC (software development lifecycle) to secure software applications from the source code up.

    When targeting supply chains, attackers are heavily dependent on the trust present in the organization. Having to prove their identity at every step can help limit attacks.

    Furthermore, attacks in a system do not always occur from outside the firewall. Limited access policies should be introduced where only the required permission is shared with individuals for them to complete a job.

    Investing Adequately:

    By far, the largest security threat that software faces is bad-quality code. Shifting Left is a practice that can avoid additional costs when the software has progressed into production. Moving left suggests that code be analyzed and vulnerabilities eliminated early in the process.

    As it is considered expensive and time-consuming, the practice is still relatively more economical than when a product has moved into production. Research from Ponemon Institute suggests that it costs $80 to fix a software defect during development, whereas it costs $7,600 to fix during production.

    Therefore, an initial investment of time, money, and resources in good quality code can help companies forego higher costs down the line.

    Close-Coordination Work & Upskilling:

    Decision-makers for businesses should work closely with the IT department to take security-driven initiatives. By keeping cybersecurity at the forefront, taking preventative measures with the input of IT professionals can create secure products and result in cost savings in the long run. Safety is at the center of all tasks and development, and future decisions revolve around it.

    Improving the developers’ skill set can positively impact cybersecurity. By investing in the IT department through training, workshops, and classes, developers and engineers upskill and add further value to a business. Also, providing them with suitable resources can result in significant profit dividends.

    SBOM goes public

    Though the SBOM has been around for the past few years, its wide usage is predicted to begin soon. An SBOM (software bill of materials) requires the software development company to list all materials used in building the product.

    SBOMs can help maintain security essentially by showcasing a software’s components. Companies can identify vulnerable access points and draw up security measures to avoid threats. Several federal agencies in the US have also shown support for SBOMs, making it a requirement for every software used by government agencies.

    It is crucial to keep in mind that a single-step initiative will not solve a company’s cybersecurity; an entire step-by-step system needs to be put into place. Every organization has different security needs. It is crucial to identify the issues first and then create the best practices for secure software development.

    The budget for cybersecurity is on the rise, not only in Canada but all over the world. Where the initial cost of secure coding practices may be high, it can make the bones of the software strong to withstand and counter cyberattacks at later stages.

  • How Code Reviews Can Make Or Break Your IT project?

    All code is guilty until proven innocent.

    Do you know that the cost of a defect increases by an order of magnitude for each consecutive stage of the software development cycle?

    This means that discovering bugs earlier can significantly save money in terms of the effort of the technical teams and can lead to better ROI. Moreover, once issues are allowed to reach the production stage, they become more difficult to diagnose and solve.

    In order to execute the project on time and within budget, preventing errors is better than fixing them. One great asset in identifying issues early on is a rigorous code review process. Code Review is the practice of systematically convening with one’s fellow programmers to check each other’s code for defects and has been shown to boost code quality and streamline the software development process. Moreover, it is also a great way to facilitate cross-training, mentoring, and learning among developers.

    Coding Sans’s State of Software Development in 2018 report highlighted that 67.66% of software developers utilized peer code review to safeguard code quality. Additionally, that percentage is even higher among successful software developers; 73.53% of the top developers employ this practice. Despite its virtues, many people still often turn a blind eye to peer code reviews as they perceive performance testing to be adequate for validation. However, neglecting code reviewing can result in severe consequences for your project delivery.

    So why are code reviews critical in executing software development smoothly? Here are four ways in which peer code reviews can add value to your IT project:

    • Code Quality And Defect Detection
    • Strong Collaboration And Knowledge Exchange
    • Streamlined Testing and Development
    • Enhanced Project Delivery

    High Code Quality

    Code reviews promise high quality as issues and errors are resolved before they skyrocket out of control. These inspections build quality into your process with excellent ROI and can reduce defects in your code by around 80%. Reviews also bring about consistency in meeting coding standards and project requirements. It improves the quality of code by concentrating on readability, maintainability, complexity, performance, and duplicated code.

    Any discussion and collaboration on code will inherently improve readability. Also, a comprehensive review process will result in the style of code becoming similar in the team. This code standardization will provide for enhanced readability with superior support and maintenance. Developers also bring in their A-game and are more likely to write clean and concise code if they’re aware that their co-workers would be reviewing it.

    Collaboration & Knowledge Exchange

    All projects have unwritten rules and implicit understandings often referred to as “institutional” or “tribal” knowledge. Code review can facilitate the transfer of this knowledge from an expert professional to a new team member. This knowledge-sharing between team encourages internal learning and presents opportunities for mentoring junior team members. With the mentor directly reviewing his junior’s work but the junior developer examining the senior’s code, junior team members’ progress will be accelerated.

    Collaboration between developers along with code standardization will bolster team productivity. This will reduce schedule delays if a team member is unavailable as any developer can take up the reins and continue steering the ship. Good reviews also encourage the development of T-shape professionals. These are individuals who are specialists in one area but have enough knowledge in the other domains to assist the continuous flow of the software development process.

    Improved Testing & Development

    Code reviews also take into account whether the code has well-designed automated tests or not. Moreover, optimizing code and consistently meeting standards will bear fruit in the form of a source code that is easier to understand for testers and specialists. Also, discovering bugs early on will help save time and money as there will be fewer delays in development due to further testing and revisions.

    When the QA team gets involved in the code reviewing process, both the programming knowledge of quality analysts and the communication between teams will be improved significantly. Testers will know what part of the code defines a particular functionality of the project, therefore strengthening teamwork.

    Effective Project Delivery

    Every software project starts with a well-defined scope and requirements. There’s a high chance of a developer misinterpreting one of these requirements and creating a useless feature. An effective code review process will validate the developed feature against the expected one. This verifies developed features and guarantees that all misinterpretations associated with the project scope or requirements are addressed at the earliest.

    Employing a consistent coding pattern and better documentation under code reviewing will make it convenient for developers to analyze existing code. This will help the project stay on track as developers will be spending more time adding features or upgrading existing ones. Also, this will benefit in the long run as well as it will be easier to onboard new developers to the project. Technical collaboration via code reviews also results in better estimates and project planning.

    Conclusion

    Overall, the peer code review process remains a critical stage in the software development lifecycle and can play a key role in enhancing the quality of code, team collaboration, and project delivery. When done right, it is a great tool to not only streamline development but also reduce the effort needed by the development team. Moreover, software testing alone has limited efficacy in defect detection. In his book, Code Complete, Steve McConnel reports that the average bug detection rate is 25% for unit testing, 35% for function testing, and 45% for integration testing. In comparison, design and code inspections have an average defect detection rate of 55% and 60%. These reviews are also crucial in establishing consistency in the source code and enabling superior testing and smoother integration. By mitigating errors, code reviews ensure the delivery of high-value solutions to clients on budget and time.